Lenovo 20149

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20149  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Product Name
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 03:01
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 116
49% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 293
33% 261 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.87 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3900100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 394 400 378 379 375 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 430
Write 368
Mixed 372
SusWrite 386
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 17.5
73% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 142
137% 214 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 8GB
666, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20149 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback