HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86D6
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 23:45
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 33.9
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 136
43% 80 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 344
35% 285 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)
HP(103C 86D6) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.40.54.01
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (52 fps cap detected)
38.9% Below average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 53.4
Parallax 38.1
42% 47.7 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 52.2
33% 37.9 fps
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 256GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXH
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,417
Write 1,170
Mixed 799
250% 1,129 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 43.6
147% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 474
340% 440 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 253%
WD WD10 SPSX-60A6WT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 139 138 142 118 126 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 13.9
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 12.6
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 233
17% 233 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx Builds (Compare 2,145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback