Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime10.7 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 19:41
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 85
1-Core 147
2-Core 290
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 940
92% 753 Pts
64-Core 1,340
83% 1,340 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Gigabyte(1458 400D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 148
Parallax 146
118% 146 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 124
Splatting 113
110% 139 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 112%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1202 834 863 776 773 623 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,988
Write 3,297
Mixed 2,144
SusWrite 845
468% 2,068 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 67.5
268% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 590
DQ Write 923
DQ Mixed 82.6
252% 532 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 246%
Great: 472%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
152GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 816 86 99 97 103 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,483
Write 1,281
Mixed 1,035
SusWrite 217
224% 1,004 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 78.8
271% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 436
DQ Write 843
DQ Mixed 78.3
219% 452 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 185%
Great: 295%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA MQ01ABD1 1TB
524GB free
Firmware: AX0R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 86 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 80.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 84.8
36% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 62%
Amd-raid ST2000DX001-1CM1 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 201 211 211 212 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 135
Write 202
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 207
108% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.5
426% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 104%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EFRX-68N 4TB
58GB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 127 130 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 151
Write 101
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 129
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 102%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EFRX-68N 4TB
46GB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 89 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 170
Write 101
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 87.6
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74%
Great: 102%
Amd-raid ST8000DM004-2CX1 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 163 170 171 163 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 95.3
Write 117
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 163
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
185% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 39.1
100% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 37.6
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback