Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core m3-6Y30 5,480 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 39.5 1-Core 34.1 2-Core 57.7 28% 43.8 Pts	4-Core 78.8 8-Core 88.6 11% 83.7 Pts	64-Core 93.7 6% 93.7 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake) 10,056 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 380E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4627 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	2.14% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 2.6 2% 2.37 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 4.1 3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.14% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B128 128GB 9,472 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: G876201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 111 102 113 110 114 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.6% Average	Read 262 Write 119 Mixed 147 SusWrite 111 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 17.4 46% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 164 130% 184 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4E6E304EE-EGCF 2x4GB 953 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	44.3% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 17.3 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 4.1 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 205 20% 205 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 10,056 samples	18x

SSD
CV1-8B256 256GBLiteonBench 77%, 8,101 samples	7x
RTHMB256VBM4MWDL 256GBBench 55%, 130 samples	6x
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	2x

RAM
K4E6E304EE-EGCF 2x4GBSamsungBench 58%, 953 samples	11x
2x4GBElpidaBench 51%, 4,362 samples	5x
K4E8E304EE-EGCF 2x2GBSamsungBench 56%, 146 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16