Gigabyte GA-M4HM87P-00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M4HM87P-00  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '17 at 14:03
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770R
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 200
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 498
48% 397 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon LJH-256V2G-11 M.2 2260 256GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FJ8110A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 497
Write 274
Mixed 356
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 25
100% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 70
105% 197 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 92%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
0GB free, PID 1a00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 8.07
Mixed 10
14% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.24
4K Write 0.11
4K Mixed 0.11
34% 2.49 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-087.A00LF 99U5428-018.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 24.5
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-M4HM87P-00 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M4HM87P-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback