Asrock FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '17 at 13:56
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri) 1,723 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	56.8% Above average	Memory 77.8 1-Core 73.4 2-Core 132 58% 94.5 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 224 28% 215 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D 5,822 User benchmarks, average bench 5% ASRock(1849 990C) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	5.27% Terrible	Lighting 6.73 Reflection 7.77 Parallax 7.06 6% 7.19 fps	MRender 3.76 Gravity 6.67 Splatting 6.83 5% 5.75 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.27% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.Y Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4443 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 797 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 630 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1703997 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 131 (C2) HDA temperature 64 59 176094904356 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 6945 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6187 (F2) Unknown 100 100 9610 (F4) Unknown 100 100 26 (F5) Unknown 100 100 61 (F6) Unknown 100 100 1823488	56.5% Above average	Read 212 Write 397 Mixed 288 68% 299 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 11.7 74% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 85.5 DQ Mixed 11.3 21% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 793GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 143 143 67 (03) Spinup time 131 131 12896239792 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2797 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7570 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1272 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2797 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2797 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 180389609507 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	75.3% Very good	Read 147 Write 116 Mixed 145 103% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.19 77% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 107%
WD 5000AAD External 500GB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 386GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 30.6 Write 30.1 Mixed 21.8 35% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.18 63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 21%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 411GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 29.3 Mixed 24.5 36% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.25 81% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-2400 2x8GB 441 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.8% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 11.4 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 8.9 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M-HD+ R2.0

CPU
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	4x
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	3x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	3x
Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples	2x

SSD
P3-512 512GBBench 75%, 2,855 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
330 Series 120GBIntel $188Bench 68%, 11,188 samples	1x

RAM
KHX1866C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 46%, 27 samples	2x
9905403-442.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,854 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $144

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16