Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 14:59
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 53.6
2-Core 104
47% 76 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 358
31% 267 Pts
64-Core 843
52% 843 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4076) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 158
Parallax 146
139% 158 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 130
Splatting 112
111% 139 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 124%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 6 1TB
860GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3213 3235 3705 1347 1032 357 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,388
Write 3,863
Mixed 1,790
SusWrite 2148
524% 2,297 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 20.8
89% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 498
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 414
315% 427 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 233%
Great: 654%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 420 426 431 398 402 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 433
Mixed 409
SusWrite 417
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 40.2
128% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 150
112% 151 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 231 158 156 55 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 490
Write 435
Mixed 409
SusWrite 174
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 41.7
134% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 150
126% 185 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 128%
XPG SPECTRIX S40 1TB
899GB free
Firmware: VB42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1352 1275 1412 1490 1049 1099 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 87 88 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 60.4
Write 79.6
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 85.6
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
147% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 64%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 141 145 149 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 138
Write 130
Mixed 69
SusWrite 142
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M4C3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 62
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 42.9
139% 48.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 29.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 124%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback