Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171114
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '21 at 14:55
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$413 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 69.6 1-Core 124 2-Core 212 75% 135 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 789 73% 609 Pts	64-Core 1,643 102% 1,643 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3362) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.1% Average	Lighting 62.1 Reflection 63.9 Parallax 11.8 51% 45.9 fps	MRender 49.6 Gravity 127 Splatting 0.8 43% 59.2 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 13 12 15 13 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Read 432 Write 83.4 Mixed 393 SusWrite 21.1 51% 232 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 93.2 4K Mixed 50.4 171% 60.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 353 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 124%
WD WD2002FFSX-68PF8N0 2TB 932 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 385GB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 132 129 132 134 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 167 Write 182 Mixed 90 SusWrite 133 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.9 203% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 114%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB 4,473 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 249GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 82 84 83 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 81.2 Write 115 Mixed 88.5 SusWrite 82.1 128% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4D3600C18 4x8GB 12,036 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 22.4 80% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 7.8 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 130%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	81x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	72x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	63x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	54x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	41x
F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 85%, 19,774 samples	23x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $1,346

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16