Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 10:22
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 186
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 493
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2680) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.6% Below average
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 36.2
Parallax 48.5
29% 39.9 fps
MRender 48.8
Gravity 43.1
Splatting 36.8
34% 42.9 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 171 186 194 184 188 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 441
Write 192
Mixed 224
SusWrite 185
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 16.5
77% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 57
62% 103 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 72%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
917GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 123 130 131 128 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 121
Write 112
Mixed 57
SusWrite 129
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.7
359% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 28.3
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback