Asus B85-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 06:09
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 575
59% 474 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2097 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 100
Parallax 61.6
60% 78.7 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 79.4
Splatting 74.4
62% 75.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 228
Write 147
Mixed 188
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 10.1
37% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 32.7
64% 127 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 70%
Kingchuxing 512GB 512GB
82GB free
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9.8 9 10 9.3 11 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.2% Poor
Read 133
Write 13.8
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 10.4
9% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
61% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 224%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
218GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 157 162 189 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 138
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 163
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback