Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 271%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics210% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive354% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory122.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 20:01
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980XE-$1,097
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 86.6
1-Core 147
2-Core 295
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 1,174
104% 879 Pts
64-Core 3484
216% 3484 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
210% Outstanding
Lighting 308
Reflection 298
Parallax 342
251% 316 fps
MRender 351
Gravity 258
Splatting 193
210% 267 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 210%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1846 1858 1863 1876 1593 1557 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
354% Outstanding
Read 2,650
Write 2013
Mixed 1,838
SusWrite 1,765
463% 2,067 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 96.4
323% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,038
DQ Write 729
DQ Mixed 900
668% 889 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 354%
Great: 431%
Seagate M3 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 102 114 116 115 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 71.4
Write 92.2
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 112
67% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
175% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 67%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 190 194 193 191 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 188
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 192
105% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
122% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 62.7
MC Mixed 45.8
140% 49 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 11.1
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 122%
Great: 237%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $784
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback