Lenovo 30AT000GUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 30AT000GUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160624
Uptime22.8 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 19:52
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 205
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 636
63% 516 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510
Nvidia(10DE 0967) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.86
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 4.2
4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandis SD7UB3Q256G1001 256GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X224
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 166 149 159 137 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 418
Write 244
Mixed 133
SusWrite 159
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 32.8
147% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 137
134% 215 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5090KB78HAF2133 Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 20.9
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 22.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30AT000GUS Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 30AT000GUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback