HP RC667AA-ABA a1657c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP RC667AA-ABA a1657c  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek NODUSM3
Memory2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 17:20
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 38
2-Core 73.7
37% 57.6 Pts
4-Core 75.3
8-Core 76.5
10% 75.9 Pts
64-Core 76.1
5% 76.1 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7900 GS
BFG(19F1 221F) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 307.83
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 19 13 19 14 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 38
Write 27.4
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 18.1
22% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 36%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
14GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 13 13 13 9 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Read 14.1
Write 13.3
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 12.2
19% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.2
60% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 3.6
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RC667AA-ABA a1657c Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP RC667AA-ABA a1657c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback