HP 550-050

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 550-050  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B2C
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150401
Uptime15 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 07:01
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 192
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 369
49% 369 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.07
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 10.3
10% 12.5 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 13.3
10% 12 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
736GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 417 412 380 395 435 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 393
Mixed 386
SusWrite 400
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 46
146% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 294
238% 337 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 125%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 28.4
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 29.4
22% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 72%
Corsair Voyager 16GB
10GB free, PID 1ab1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 16 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
8.62% Terrible
Read 32.7
Write 19.4
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 17.8
28% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.62%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99[2/7/4]031 Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 18.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-050 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-050

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $338
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback