Compaq-presario AY026AA-ABA CQ5300F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemCompaq-presario AY026AA-ABA CQ5300F  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON NARRA5
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 04:21
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 805
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 36.6
2-Core 73
42% 62.3 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 150
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Asus(1043 838A) 1GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 2.6
4% 4.97 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 3.9
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 64 58 78 80 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 8.9
Write 40.1
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 64.7
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
44% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21%
Great: 58%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
27GB free
Firmware: JF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 61 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 62.4
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 60.2
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HDS721680PLA 80GB
74GB free
Firmware: P21O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 70 70 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 67.8
Write 67.4
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 68.9
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 40%
PNY USB 3.0 to SATA-¢ó 500GB
114GB free, PID 8001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 66 66 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 126
Mixed 120
SusWrite 65.4
150% 116 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 20
1,488% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.9
DQ Write 46.8
DQ Mixed 28.2
2,658% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 108%
Great: 166%
PNY USB 3.0 to SATA-¢ó 240GB
222GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 63 64 68 66 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 106
Mixed 131
SusWrite 67.4
148% 115 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 10.6
1,081% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 46.6
DQ Mixed 31.5
2,757% 35 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 101%
Great: 168%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
24.5% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.7
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AY026AA-ABA CQ5300F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq-presario AY026AA-ABA CQ5300F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback