Sony SVT13112FXS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSony SVT13112FXS  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 01:52
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 65
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 24.7
37% 48.4 Pts
4-Core 76.3
8-Core 118
12% 96.9 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sony(104D 90A8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253A3001T 1TB
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 230 265 230 281 292 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.2% Average
Read 224
Write 205
Mixed 201
SusWrite 262
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 6.4
32% 9.57 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 49.3
67% 120 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 102%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
28GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 6.2 7.8 6.5 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.77% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 6.9
Mixed 10.6
SusWrite 9.1
14% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
65% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.77%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EBU0-DJ-F TEAMGROUP-SD3-1600 12GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.1% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 2.9
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SVT13112FXS Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Sony SVT13112FXS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback