Asus PRIME Z590-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z590-A  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 23:58
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 168
2-Core 308
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 1149
106% 887 Pts
64-Core 1,786
110% 1,786 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)
46.4% Average
Lighting 53.3
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 67.4
43% 63 fps
MRender 57.3
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 66.4
52% 63.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 155 148 162 135 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 389
Write 277
Mixed 276
SusWrite 156
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 33.1
127% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 212
164% 223 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 90%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
410GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3153 3254 3120 755 757 752 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
406% Outstanding
Read 2,933
Write 3,245
Mixed 2,917
SusWrite 1,965
623% 2,765 MB/s
4K Read 78.7
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 110
363% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,411
DQ Write 1,080
DQ Mixed 1,194
907% 1,228 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 406%
Great: 429%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
35GB free
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 169 57 84 24 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 483
Write 407
Mixed 240
SusWrite 104
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 38
126% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 150
143% 226 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 88%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
116GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 63.4
Write 58.3
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 90.7
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 76%
WD My Passport 25E2 3TB
979GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 78.7
Write 81.7
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 76.6
102% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 59%
WDC WD50 00LPVT-22G33T0 500GB
76GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.9 2.9 0.9 0 1.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.8% Terrible
Read 34.9
Write 2.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 1.8
10% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.8%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 34.8
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 43.8
SC Mixed 31.9
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z590-A Builds (Compare 7,408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z590-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $592
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback