MSI MS-16L2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GT62VR 7RE
MotherboardMSI MS-16L2  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 22:38
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.1% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 216
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 593
58% 476 Pts
64-Core 593
37% 593 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070
Device(5115 86BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.7% Very good
Lighting 96
Reflection 120
Parallax 98.3
78% 105 fps
MRender 97.9
Gravity 98.1
Splatting 105
82% 100 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39MNC-3510A 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 50100P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 356 357 315 316 313 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 365
Mixed 315
SusWrite 330
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 36.1
136% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 273
224% 321 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 93%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
524GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 112 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 122
Write 104
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 112
65% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7D8MB-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
81% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 25.7
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16L2 Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MS-16L2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback