Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 100B SFF PC (Adina) (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn 2ACA
Memory	4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110725
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '21 at 18:32
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	27.4% Poor	Memory 50.1 1-Core 19.3 2-Core 28 24% 32.5 Pts	4-Core 29.2 8-Core 36.7 4% 33 Pts	64-Core 37.3 2% 37.3 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 36%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 254GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 45 60 72 78 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 65 Write 28.1 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 71 40% 53.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 6GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 5 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 1.7 6% 2.1 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16