Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive347% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory119 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210602
Uptime22.7 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 10:11
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 64.6
1-Core 154
2-Core 307
91% 175 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,099
100% 839 Pts
64-Core 5,519
342% 5,519 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.8% Excellent
Lighting 99.6
Reflection 112
Parallax 101
81% 104 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 98.2
Splatting 99.2
80% 97.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
608GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2226 2082 2048 2079 2071 2058 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,474
Write 2641
Mixed 1383
SusWrite 2,094
483% 2,148 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 71
247% 89.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,222
DQ Write 730
DQ Mixed 943
711% 965 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 347%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C15 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 61.3
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 67.9
157% 55 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 32.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 137%
Great: 176%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback