Toshiba Satellite C55D-B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite C55D-B  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA ZBWAE
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 07:31
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 45.2
1-Core 35.7
2-Core 73.2
31% 51.4 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 132
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Toshiba(1179 F917) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3
Parallax 3.6
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 3.8
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 452
Write 338
Mixed 376
86% 389 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 33.5
108% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 195
146% 196 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP008GLSTU160N02 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C55D-B Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55D-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback