Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 560 25 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Micro-FCPGA, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	21.7% Poor	Memory 38 1-Core 67.1 2-Core 8.8 29% 38 Pts	4-Core 33.4 8-Core 29.5 4% 31.5 Pts	64-Core 63 4% 63 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1033 893B) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.38% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.38% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900BB3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 174 109 79 32 46 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.6% Very poor	Read 132 Write 121 Mixed 26 SusWrite 88.5 20% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 5.2 26% 7.93 MB/s	DQ Read 53.1 DQ Write 7.2 DQ Mixed 21.5 18% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CK0 2x2GB 443 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.78% Terrible	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.63 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 0.7 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.4 GB/s	Latency 212 19% 212 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.78% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5 M 560IntelBench 45%, 25 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 41%, 443 samples	1x

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $20

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16