Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C70-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE PRO C70-A  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 01:51
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820QM-$275
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 193
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 463
52% 405 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 355 369 363 367 365 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 446
Write 420
Mixed 363
SusWrite 368
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 20.2
84% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 258
219% 322 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 117%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
59GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 24 24 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 21.2
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 24.4
31% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 3.3
187% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1777 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.5% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE PRO C70-A Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C70-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback