PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Samsung Samsung DeskTop System (all builds) |
Motherboard | SAMSUNG Samsung DeskTop System |
Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20081201 |
Uptime | 5 Days |
Run Date | Oct 12 '21 at 18:24 |
Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
Run User | LKA-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
40.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.01
|
3.42%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 169 100 85 97 25 MB/s
|
52.1%
Above average
|
|||
Maxtor STM3250820AS 250GB
49GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 64 64 64 62 MB/s
|
32.4%
Below average
|
|||
Dell Portable 1TB
171GB free, PID 9009
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 53 54 52 53 50 MB/s
|
27.7%
Poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
256GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 53 52 53 50 MB/s
|
27.4%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
18.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 229x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 185x |
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 106x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 243x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 151x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 97x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |