Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung Samsung DeskTop System  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG Samsung DeskTop System
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20081201
Uptime5 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 18:24
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 54.9
1-Core 40.8
2-Core 81.1
37% 58.9 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 140
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5
Parallax 2
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 169 100 85 97 25 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.1% Above average
Read 224
Write 212
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 111
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 23.9
93% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 106
100% 154 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 88%
Maxtor STM3250820AS 250GB
49GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 64 64 64 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 50.3
Write 22.3
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 62.3
32% 42.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 44%
Dell Portable 1TB
171GB free, PID 9009
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 53 54 52 53 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 72
Write 53.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 51.7
71% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
256GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 53 52 53 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 72.8
Write 79.3
Mixed 32
SusWrite 51.5
78% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Samsung DeskTop System Builds (Compare 1,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback