Asrock B450 Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics64.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450 Gaming-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 17:49
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 640
64% 523 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.2% Good
Lighting 84.2
Reflection 79
Parallax 69.7
69% 77.6 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 76.1
Splatting 65.8
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 138 138 94 139 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 490
Write 141
Mixed 206
SusWrite 131
53% 242 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 34.7
123% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 127
103% 146 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
501GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 200 202 194 207 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 140
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 200
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 106%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$57
608GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 179 182 182 182 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 125
Write 149
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 181
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown=> Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 1,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B450 Gaming-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback