Medion Erazer X5329 F/B620

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Erazer X5329 F/B620  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7848
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150717
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 17:38
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 212
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 589
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3203) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.6% Poor
Lighting 32.9
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 30.6
27% 22.8 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 35.5
Splatting 30.3
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF128HCHP-00000 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT0101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 22 21 20 19 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 464
Write 29.4
Mixed 43.1
SusWrite 21.1
29% 139 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 15.8
72% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 13.6
DQ Mixed 23.9
37% 75 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
916GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 178 175 177 175 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 141
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 177
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.4
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer X5329 F/B620 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Medion Erazer X5329 F/B620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $333
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback