Asus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 17:34
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 283
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 831
86% 692 Pts
64-Core 806
50% 806 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.6% Very good
Lighting 95.5
Reflection 106
Parallax 107
78% 103 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 95.2
Splatting 94.5
77% 94.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 820 857 885 901 905 899 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,442
Write 918
Mixed 893
SusWrite 878
230% 1,033 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 71.2
251% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 875
DQ Mixed 223
281% 482 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 216%
Great: 242%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2289 2322 2352 1865 1470 1456 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
355% Outstanding
Read 2,411
Write 2,138
Mixed 1,615
SusWrite 1,959
456% 2,031 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 83.8
276% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,385
DQ Write 988
DQ Mixed 1,166
877% 1,180 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 355%
Great: 435%
Origin Inception TLC830 SSD 1TB
680GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 408 421 452 451 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 426
Mixed 314
SusWrite 385
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 39.5
154% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 223
194% 285 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
421GB free
Firmware: DEM9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 109 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 109
Write 104
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 109
69% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 29.3
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 43.2
SC Mixed 29.5
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING Builds (Compare 4,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $962
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback