Lenovo 20BX001PUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20BX001PUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BX001PUS
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190814
Uptime11 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 16:05
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 84.6
1-Core 58
2-Core 126
56% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 190
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5036) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.26% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 3
Parallax 6.7
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.26%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 404 425 393 428 431 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 447
Mixed 344
SusWrite 403
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 41.5
138% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 221
166% 222 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 111%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
9GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 10 7.5 12 9.9 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 20.7
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 10.7
25% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 2.9
214% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4B8G1646B-MYK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 14.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20BX001PUS Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20BX001PUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback