Arcelik 1D6-PC GBLOPT58G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemArcelik 1D6-PC GBLOPT58G  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67OW
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 13:45
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$188
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 177
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 458
50% 394 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Lighting 43.2
Reflection 40
Parallax 38.5
35% 40.6 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 27.1
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD240LE 240GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 104 5.2 8.1 49 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 358
Write 383
Mixed 319
SusWrite 57.6
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 15.7
80% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 90.8
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 23.7
68% 140 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 93%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
737GB free
Firmware: JA0OA590
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 79 85 93 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 86.5
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 86.5
54% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1D6-PC GBLOPT58G Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Arcelik 1D6-PC GBLOPT58G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback