Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	33% Below average	Memory 59.4 1-Core 19.6 2-Core 20.1 26% 33 Pts	4-Core 37.8 8-Core 124 9% 80.8 Pts	64-Core 298 18% 298 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Dell(1028 0772) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.3% Average	Lighting 54.4 Reflection 58.8 Parallax 60.3 44% 57.8 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 34.6 Splatting 58.8 44% 53.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 82%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 430 Write 408 Mixed 378 90% 405 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 24.5 92% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 244 189% 261 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABD4162C HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	42.1% Average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 11.4 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.1 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	956x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	627x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	177x

SSD
THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 109%, 23,829 samples	121x
X400 M.2 2280 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 12,357 samples	107x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $50Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	76x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 27,567 samples	550x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 4,851 samples	110x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3H1 2x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 2,972 samples	100x