Lenovo 82AS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 82AS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2160 x 1350 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 11:37
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 73%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 226
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 364
43% 333 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F18) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 3
Parallax 7.7
6% 5.8 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ256MEE1OWX 256GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0C0628
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 392 336 328 357 356 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,329
Write 849
Mixed 911
SusWrite 351
191% 860 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 62.2
196% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 738
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 486
377% 527 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 161%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 11.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.4
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82AS Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82AS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback