Medion Akoya P5337 H/B566

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion Akoya P5337 H/B566  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H81H3-EM2
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 07:12
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 98
2-Core 192
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 368
49% 365 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
MSI(1462 284B) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 32.3
19% 27.4 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 26.2
24% 30 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 55 48 35 20 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 435
Write 374
Mixed 300
SusWrite 58.1
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 13.2
69% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 80.8
DQ Mixed 31.2
42% 75.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
693GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 193 192 192 190 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 148
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 192
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Akoya P5337 H/B566 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Akoya P5337 H/B566

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback