Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6267U 1,134 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 78 1-Core 99.7 2-Core 176 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 274 36% 273 Pts	64-Core 273 17% 273 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris 550 (Mobile Skylake) 792 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Apple(106B 015D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Lighting 12.9 Reflection 12 Parallax 11.7 10% 12.2 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 11.6 Splatting 18.7 12% 14 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB 1,227 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 422 Write 375 Mixed 403 89% 400 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 7.39 45% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 12.9 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 7.4 24% 48.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x4D5435324C3531324D3332443250462D3039 2x4GB 1,234 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	MC Read 28 MC Write 49.3 MC Mixed 21.6 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 20.6 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 84.3 47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-6267UIntelBench 57%, 1,134 samples	2x

GPU
Iris Graphics 550IntelBench 8%, 819 samples	2x

SSD
Portable SSD X5 1TBSamsungBench 156%, 100 samples	1x
Extreme SSD 500GBSandiskBench 67%, 4,692 samples	1x

RAM
0x4D5435324C3531324D3332443250462D3039 2x4GBUnknownBench 82%, 1,234 samples	1x
0x4D5435324C31473332443450472D30393320 2x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 2,090 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16