TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Shuangwei E5M-2011 V3.0 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardShuangwei E5M-2011 V3.0 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '21 at 00:52
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 69
2-Core 166
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 612
55% 466 Pts
64-Core 796
49% 796 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 70.8%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
PowerColor(148C 2379)
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.9.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 58
Parallax 77.9
48% 64.7 fps
MRender 59
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 42.9
43% 54.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 46.1%
 Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 224 211 209 209 212 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.8% Good
Read 226
Write 234
Mixed 238
SusWrite 216
52% 228 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 35.2
110% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 125
114% 175 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 65.8%
 Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ81RF4BDWD- Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.7% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 17.8
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical E5M-2011 V3.0 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Shuangwei E5M-2011 V3.0 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Xeon E5-2667 v2IntelBench 75%, 1,324 samples6x
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples2x
Xeon E5-2697 v2IntelBench 69%, 1,265 samples1x
GPU
GTX 980Nvidia  $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples4x
GTX 580Nvidia  $450Bench 23%, 15,395 samples2x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples1x
SSD
SSD 256GBPcieBench 152%, 15,792 samples2x
840 250GBSamsung  $251Bench 70%, 41,998 samples2x
750 EVO 250GBSamsung  $130Bench 94%, 75,831 samples1x
RAM
M393B5170GB0- Dimm2_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- Dimm4_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- Dimm6_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- 16GBDimm0_ManufacturerBench 98%, 118 samples3x
M393B2G70BH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 218 samples3x
HMT42GR7AFR4C 4x16GBHynixBench 81%, 60 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback