MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '21 at 22:04
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 135
50% 87.9 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 221
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 69.6
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 92.1
57% 76.7 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 75.1
Splatting 50.3
52% 66.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
461GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 335 419 427 440 440 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 428
Mixed 379
SusWrite 400
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 38.2
146% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 230
177% 241 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 117%
Samsung HD200HJ 200GB
184GB free
Firmware: KF100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 77 76 77 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
50% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 44.8
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 76.4
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A2133C10 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.8% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7.3
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 1,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $63
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback