Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	23.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 L 640 2,030 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	38.6% Below average	Memory 59.9 1-Core 28.8 2-Core 69.2 34% 52.6 Pts	4-Core 97.2 8-Core 130 14% 114 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssdpr-cl 100-120-G3 120GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1125A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 194 124 94 109 60 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.7% Poor	Read 167 Write 114 Mixed 144 SusWrite 119 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 16.5 4K Mixed 0.7 24% 8.87 MB/s	DQ Read 47.9 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 35.7 38% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 84%
Corsair Voyager 4GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 1ab1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.6 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.93% Terrible	Read 19.7 Write 5.7 Mixed 8.4 SusWrite 5.7 11% 9.88 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.93% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.17 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.4 13% 4.53 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7 L 640IntelBench 41%, 2,030 samples	6x
Core i5 M 540IntelBench 41%, 8,329 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	8x

SSD
GOODRAM 120GBBench 68%, 5,433 samples	2x
SKC380S3120G 120GBKingstonBench 43%, 208 samples	1x
EX. 240GBQ200Bench 81%, 97 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16