Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506II
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateOct 11 '21 at 18:52
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 75.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 281
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 846
87% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,072
66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16DF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.06
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 20.8
13% 33.5 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 17.1
13% 15.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1261 1336 1249 1008 536 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1510
Write 1,542
Mixed 1,078
SusWrite 915
283% 1,261 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 77.7
275% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 569
DQ Write 747
DQ Mixed 396
372% 570 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 231%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16S4B.16FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 28
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 19.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback