Lenovo 20089

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20089  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120511
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 11 '21 at 12:36
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B960
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 87.1
1-Core 58.3
2-Core 115
55% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 115
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3975) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 4
1% 2.17 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-128 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 143 79 55 129 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 433
Write 324
Mixed 305
SusWrite 133
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 21.4
86% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 155
130% 185 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 48%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20089 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20089

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback