IBM System x3400 M3 Server -[7379K4G]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemIBM System x3400 M3 Server -[7379K4G]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 69Y4356
Memory61.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 11 '21 at 12:15
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5620
Node 1 Socket 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 122
52% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 302
33% 262 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M1015 438GB
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
Read 332
Write 19.8
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 19
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 96%
IBM ServeRAID M1015 998GB
138GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 91 91 93 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 197
Write 155
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 92.1
87% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.9
198% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83%
Great: 183%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback