HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics68.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Z4 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C5
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '21 at 12:02
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2133
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 35.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 242
66% 132 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 694
71% 575 Pts
64-Core 951
59% 951 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
HP(103C 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.8% Good
Lighting 80.6
Reflection 91.6
Parallax 83.9
66% 85.4 fps
MRender 89.9
Gravity 86.6
Splatting 95.9
75% 90.8 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1116 1054 1013 1659 2024 2063 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 690
Write 551
Mixed 517
SusWrite 1,488
184% 812 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 60
157% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 986
DQ Write 608
DQ Mixed 901
644% 832 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 205%
Great: 393%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
931GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 207 204 204 208 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 179
Mixed 70
SusWrite 205
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 115%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1K43BB1-CTD Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-VK Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-VK M393A1K43BB1-CTD 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 49.4
MC Mixed 25.5
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 11.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 226
18% 226 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,075 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback