Asus P7P55D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus P7P55D  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '17 at 10:49
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 95.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 201
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 500
53% 426 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 83BC) 1GB
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 11.2
10% 12.2 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 12
Splatting 15.6
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
80.4% Excellent
Read 269
Write 214
Mixed 216
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 43.9
159% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 88.3
88% 141 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
113GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 88.8
Mixed 90.4
68% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
38GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 95.6
Write 84.3
Mixed 95
69% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.39
91% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $159
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback