Lenovo 10AAS09E07

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 10AAS09E07  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 13:36
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 157
70% 115 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 240
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 30A3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5166
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.59% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 4.4
3% 3.2 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3.2
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.59%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IR-SSDPR-S25A-240 240GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 390 405 399 384 344 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 260
Write 355
Mixed 289
SusWrite 383
73% 322 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 23
109% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 193
171% 253 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 102%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 500GB
58GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 49 47 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 43.7
Write 30.8
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 47.9
53% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170EB68F9W1600 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10AAS09E07 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AAS09E07

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $15
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback