Lenovo 2349FS4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2349FS4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2349FS4
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 09:56
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 85
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 115
54% 85 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 207
23% 180 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F3) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4491
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 4.5
6% 4.8 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 2500 Series 240GB-$225
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LUDi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 152 123 164 138 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 426
Write 115
Mixed 214
SusWrite 151
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 16.7
73% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 155
141% 217 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
29.9% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2349FS4 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2349FS4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback