HP Pavilion x360 Convertible 11-ap0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion x360 Convertible 11-ap0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85CA
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime14.4 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 05:36
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 46.8
1-Core 57.8
2-Core 112
41% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 220
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
HP(103C 85CA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 3.7
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128-HP 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V881
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 123 130 126 121 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 422
Write 140
Mixed 161
SusWrite 125
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 18.1
86% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 130
104% 147 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 95%
SDXC Card 1TB
994GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 4.2 4.2 4.5 4.5 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 5.3
Mixed 7.3
SusWrite 4
9% 7.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A512M16TB-062E:J 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.2
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion x360 Convertible 11-ap0xxx Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion x360 Convertible 11-ap0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback