bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 21:08
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 46.3
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 120
46% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 183
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 3650
Sapphire(174B BE42) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.4
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 4.9
3% 3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 101 68 56 55 49 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.8% Poor
Read 161
Write 131
Mixed 127
SusWrite 86.3
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 13.4
56% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 36
DQ Mixed 17.7
16% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-003.A00LF 99U5402-002.A01LF 99U5402-003.A00LF 99U5402-002.A01LF 4GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 13
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback