Compaq-presario FL453AA-ACB SG3501RU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCompaq-presario FL453AA-ACB SG3501RU  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Boston
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101006
Uptime13 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 17:24
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5450-$195
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 42.9
2-Core 83.6
43% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 170
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 18.7
14% 18.2 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 19
Splatting 17.1
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CHH
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 54.4
Mixed 36.2
35% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 42%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB
26GB free, PID 9102
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
8.25% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 15.5
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 14.9
22% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
59% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.25%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20.2% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 6R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 48% 23 171 104 75 21.7" 1536 864 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback