MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 15:58
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 77.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 867
79% 663 Pts
64-Core 1,077
67% 1,077 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2092 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.3% Good
Lighting 76.5
Reflection 80.5
Parallax 72.4
62% 76.5 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 77.2
Splatting 70.7
59% 72.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 788 539 541 541 541 542 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,686
Write 798
Mixed 1,275
SusWrite 582
241% 1,085 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 87.7
298% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 942
DQ Mixed 346
402% 685 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 234%
Great: 277%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
82GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 233 233 227 213 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 471
Mixed 339
SusWrite 248
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 58.2
201% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 339
264% 363 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 115%
Great: 114%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
57GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 405 393 171 138 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 483
Mixed 425
SusWrite 283
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 55.3
191% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 239
215% 326 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 113%
Great: 126%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
315GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 74.1
Write 68.1
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 73
49% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 87%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
266GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 80 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 78
Write 23
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 77.9
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 32.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 32.2
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 62: 10R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
62% 13% 106 344 282 60 31.6" 2560 1440 ACR0507 EB321HQU
Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $685
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback