ECT One Computer Core i7-4790K, 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemECT One Computer Core i7-4790K, 4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 14:57
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 795
79% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,042
64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3711) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 193
Reflection 188
Parallax 213
158% 198 fps
MRender 247
Gravity 198
Splatting 158
159% 201 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 147%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PH6-CE240-L 240GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F/W:1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 471
Write 456
Mixed 337
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 37.9
140% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 37.8
DQ Mixed 171
125% 171 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 92%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
127GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 471 467 474 471 469 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 465
Mixed 438
SusWrite 470
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 58.7
194% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
36GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,304
Write 2,273
Mixed 2,232
507% 2,269 MB/s
4K Read 67.8
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 89.7
293% 99.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,382
DQ Write 1,007
DQ Mixed 1,143
868% 1,177 MB/s
Poor: 283% Great: 526%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
14GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 100 113 101 123 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 133
Write 125
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 109
72% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 25A3 16TB
97GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 102 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 99.4
Mixed 96.1
SusWrite 99.1
135% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 2.1
330% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 109%
WD My Passport 0830 2TB
36GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 51 50 52 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 51
103% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 25A3 16TB
99GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 196 199 200 200 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 172
Mixed 151
SusWrite 197
239% 174 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 2.6
367% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3466C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3467 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 31.5
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 30.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 106%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical One Computer Core i7-4790K, 4 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: ECT One Computer Core i7-4790K, 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $497
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback