Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus KGP(M)E-D16  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 11:07
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6128
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 61
1-Core 29.5
2-Core 59.1
34% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 236
21% 177 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Lighting 66.2
Reflection 68
Parallax 63.5
54% 65.9 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 63.4
54% 67 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB-$503
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 89 90 77 70 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35% Below average
Read 224
Write 204
Mixed 170
SusWrite 78.1
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 18.8
63% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 54.5
DQ Mixed 25.6
23% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 35%
Great: 100%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 91 91 79 71 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 136
Write 133
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 79.4
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71
9GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 54 49 54 44 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 57.9
Write 48.2
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 50.1
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 41%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
498GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 54 49 54 44 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 163
Write 156
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 50.2
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.5% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback