HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8392
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime46.9 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 10:24
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 197
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 343
43% 329 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8392) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.24% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 6.5
5% 13.7 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.1
6% 7.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.24%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dogfish 240GB 240GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0809B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 45 34 36 26 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 464
Write 400
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 78.7
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 0.2
48% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 87.9
DQ Write 25.8
DQ Mixed 27.9
28% 47.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 95%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
813GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 129 127 127 125 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 120
Write 101
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 126
67% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO8GX4M1A2133C15 Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6H1 16GB
2133, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.5% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 20.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx Builds (Compare 1,450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback